×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Chapter 5 of the Active 101: US 101 San Mateo County Crossings Improvement Implementation Plan

TA is accepting comments from December 9 to December 17th, 2025

This document contains Chapter 5 of the Active 101: US 101 San Mateo County Crossings IMprovement Implementation Plan. Chapter 5 contains the Selected Projects that received additional assessment. Please provide comments on project(s) relevant to you. Comments are due back by December 17th, 2025.

Instructions:

Review the draft document and provide your feedback by clicking anywhere in the document to provide comments, suggested changes, or questions about the plan:

  • Use the scroll bar on the right side, or click the "Drag" option in the top toolbar to navigate from page to page.
  • Click "Comment" in the top toolbar, then click anywhere on the document page to leave feedback. You will be asked to enter your name and email address to submit a comment. 
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio

Comments

View all Cancel

Add comment

Jeff Dec 12 2025 at 1:30PM on page 13

Question
Is there a "plan B" if the lane reductions don't pan out due to traffic operational needs?

Jeff Dec 12 2025 at 1:26PM on page 9

Question
Could this bus stop be moved to the far side of the intersection?

Jeff Dec 12 2025 at 1:25PM on page 8

Suggestion
double check legend as property lines aren't easily seen on the map, the green pavement marking is not shown on the map, etc.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:59PM on page 13

Suggestion
The final sentence seems out of place. Consider just listing your assumptions broadly.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:58PM on page 13

Suggestion
So the estimates are SWAGs? Can we reference an acceptable estimation method, like parametric, analogous, bottom-up?

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:57PM on page 13

Suggestion
Is it necessary to separate out construction management specifically? This is bizarre to me. I can see focusing on pre-design, design, and construction... or I can see focusing on professional services and goods/services and contingency. Consider what story you want to tell with the costs.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:56PM on page 13

Question
Is additional ROW needed?

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:55PM on page 10

Suggestion
Not just more attractive and comfortable, but they contribute to reducing pollution-generating impervious surfaces and our watershed vision. Focus on stormwater management goals.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:54PM on page 10

Suggestion
The City's vision of moving people more efficiently than single-occupancy vehicles.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:53PM on page 10

Suggestion
I would not use language like "Class 1"... call it a shared-use or multi-use path, something my mother-in-law would understand.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:38PM on page 10

Suggestion
Should crosswalks be the focus here rather than the refuge islands? You could say "Existing crosswalks will be raised to the sidewalk level, calming vehicle speeds where it matters most. Crosswalks will include accessible features, like detectable warning devices, and safety features like median refuges."

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:35PM on page 10

Suggestion
Rather: "The west side curb will be moved 6ft east, maintaining adequate travel lane widths while providing space for a landscape buffer between autos/buses and people riding bikes."

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:34PM on page 10

Suggestion
I don't believe the City has a particular vision of increasing bus service, but rather a vision of moving more people effectively, and bus service is the best way to do that. I would make a stronger correlation between transit and achieving TDM goals, which supports our circulation element vision.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:32PM on page 9

Suggestion
I don't see any value in mentioning that the improvements are per the samtrans plan. Just say what the changes are.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:31PM on page 9

Question
Should crosswalks be raised?

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:31PM on page 9

Suggestion
Mention accessibility upgrades, like curb ramps.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:29PM on page 8

Suggestion
Find a way to communicate that the western curb will move but the eastern curb will not.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:25PM on page 7

Suggestion
I could see both sides working long term, so I think we can say that both design options will be considered as well as their connections to the long term plan.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:24PM on page 7

Suggestion
The capacity of the existing roadway is limited by the signalized intersections, not the corridor. Making mention of the bottleneck helps readers understand the impacts of making changes along the segment while preserving node capacity.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:22PM on page 7

Suggestion
How many routes, and how often do they currently use the road? Consider providing more detail since the design shows you will be providing separate facilities for transit only.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:21PM on page 6

Suggestion
Make mention of accessible features or characteristics.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:21PM on page 6

Suggestion
I wouldn't qualify the traffic volumes as high, but they are peaky as the route primarily serves commuters.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:19PM on page 6

Suggestion
To demonstrate the gaps, consider hatching the sidewalk with green and changing the name to "intermittent sidewalk"

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:16PM on page 5

Question
How does it advance a new trail crossing over US-101? It's a good distance from the Shaw Overcrossing project.

Matthew Dec 12 2025 at 10:11AM on page 9

Question
Why are we proposing a boarding island on the southbound direction and not the northbound?

Matthew Dec 12 2025 at 10:10AM on page 9

Suggestion
Adjust the cross sections so they line up. At a quick glance, it looks like we are shifting over the median.

Matthew Dec 12 2025 at 10:08AM on page 8

Suggestion
Please show the Right of Way; the graphics are blurry, so maybe it is there, and I can see it.

Matthew Dec 12 2025 at 10:02AM on page 3

Suggestion
Can we add the existing cross-section above or below the proposed one to show what is being modified?

Matthew Dec 12 2025 at 10:01AM on page 3

Suggestion
Can we see the existing cross section above or below the proposed? it would be helpful to see that the existing median is not being rebuild, etc.
View all