×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Chapter 5 of the Active 101: US 101 San Mateo County Crossings Improvement Implementation Plan

TA is accepting comments from December 9 to December 17th, 2025

This document contains Chapter 5 of the Active 101: US 101 San Mateo County Crossings IMprovement Implementation Plan. Chapter 5 contains the Selected Projects that received additional assessment. Please provide comments on project(s) relevant to you. Comments are due back by December 17th, 2025.

Instructions:

Review the draft document and provide your feedback by clicking anywhere in the document to provide comments, suggested changes, or questions about the plan:

  • Use the scroll bar on the right side, or click the "Drag" option in the top toolbar to navigate from page to page.
  • Click "Comment" in the top toolbar, then click anywhere on the document page to leave feedback. You will be asked to enter your name and email address to submit a comment. 
File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-
Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio

Comments

View all Cancel

Commenting is closed for this document.

Hanieh Houshmandi Dec 17 2025 at 1:22PM on page 59

Suggestion
Please prepare to answer a question from SC city council on how many parking spaces are lost with this option.

Hanieh Houshmandi Dec 17 2025 at 1:17PM on page 50

Question
Is San Mateo County not a stakeholder? I believe there is a small portion under unincorporated County jurisdiction.

Hanieh Houshmandi Dec 17 2025 at 1:11PM on page 53

Question
D?

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:59PM on page 82

Suggestion
I think it would be good to mention that as part of future project phase, should engage businesses along Bay and specifically the loading/unloading, as rear building access is limited on the County side. In addition, should do outreach at Verbo. link

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:56PM on page 82

Suggestion
and County

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:55PM on page 78

Suggestion
Barron Ave (spelling)

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:54PM on page 78

Suggestion
Kaynyne St (spelling)

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:52PM on page 74

Suggestion
Could also add that existing marked crossings at uncontrolled locations are not high-visibility
in reply to Chanda Singh's comment

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:50PM on page 72

Also - MTC Regional Active Transportation Plan, CCAG HIN

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:48PM on page 72

Suggestion
San Mateo County ATP

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:47PM on page 63

Question
Can this include more discussion on Industrial's role as a truck route and what the needs are in terms of loading, unloading, and access re: turning movements? How do the options differ or address those needs?

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:44PM on page 64

Question
Promoted by multiple jurisdictions or just one city?
in reply to Chanda Singh's comment

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:42PM on page 59

Sorry - confused! ignore comment

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:41PM on page 59

Suggestion
This is the wrong description for Option 1

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:40PM on page 60

Suggestion
Could also reference maintenance of flexible posts

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:39PM on page 60

Suggestion
See comment above re: transit. Suggest adding shuttle route map (if that's what these amenities are intended to serve) and more info to clarify. Depending on who is providing shuttle service, hours of operations, etc., unless there is intention to increase or fixed route transit option, I'm not clear on this.

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:38PM on page 59

Question
Earlier, text states that there isn't transit service - just shuttles. If there isn't any fixed route transit, can you clarify why design should have bus islands? if there is fixed route transit present (or planned), can this be added to discussion above?

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:36PM on page 59

Suggestion
Suggest listing the three intersections here.

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:34PM on page 55

Suggestion
Cannot see these recommendations with current graphic quality

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:33PM on page 55

Question
What is an intermediate level bike lane?

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:32PM on page 54

Since there are multiple jurisdictions involved, can we calrify which jurisdictions participated in this convening, reviewed, and supported the options?

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:31PM on page 54

Suggestion
If intention here is to reference adopted plans, please add County ATP calls for Class 2 from Harbor to Belmont Creek, and Class 2 Buffered from Belmont Creek to ONeill Ave. link

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:26PM on page 54

Suggestion
Jurisdiction staff

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:22PM on page 51

Suggestion
"It is a wide roadway with high traffic volumes, as it is a designated truck route serving..."

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:21PM on page 51

Suggestion
jurisdictions (instead of cities)

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:17PM on page 50

Suggestion
Should County be listed here?

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:16PM on page 49

Suggestion
The section of Unincorporated County isn't denoted here (it's small), and it might be worth stating somewhere that Belmont is likely to annex the unincorporated area section at some point in the near future. link

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 4:02PM on page 48

Suggestion
Is there anyway to put in a higher quality image here (or vector file)? Zooming in = blurry

Chanda Singh Dec 16 2025 at 3:52PM on page 4

Suggestion
Can this be replaced with a higher quality image? It is blurry.

Steve Ojeda Dec 16 2025 at 11:56AM on page 20

Question
Should there be mention of Caltrans process/coordination since they have jurisdiction over a significant portion of the study limits?

Steve Ojeda Dec 16 2025 at 11:47AM on page 30

Suggestion
The Complete Streets Committee were open to reviewing other design alternatives.

Steve Ojeda Dec 16 2025 at 11:36AM on page 30

Suggestion
The conceptual designs were presented to the Complete Streets Committee.

Batool Zaro Dec 16 2025 at 10:58AM on page 85

Suggestion
Could we add some East Palo Alto Key Connections?

Batool Zaro Dec 16 2025 at 10:56AM on page 85

Suggestion
For clarity I would modify the location language slightly. "E Bayshore from Menalto Avenue to Bay Road, Sarratoga Avenue..." Similar to page 148

Steve Ojeda Dec 16 2025 at 10:53AM on page 21

Question
Is there enough space for bus boarding islands given the proposed cross-sections?

Steve Ojeda Dec 16 2025 at 9:10AM on page 19

Question
should this be US 101?

Steve Ojeda Dec 16 2025 at 8:57AM on page 19

Suggestion
San Bruno Avenue is classified in the City's General Plan as an arterial street.

Jeff Dec 12 2025 at 1:30PM on page 13

Question
Is there a "plan B" if the lane reductions don't pan out due to traffic operational needs?

Jeff Dec 12 2025 at 1:26PM on page 9

Question
Could this bus stop be moved to the far side of the intersection?

Jeff Dec 12 2025 at 1:25PM on page 8

Suggestion
double check legend as property lines aren't easily seen on the map, the green pavement marking is not shown on the map, etc.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:59PM on page 13

Suggestion
The final sentence seems out of place. Consider just listing your assumptions broadly.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:58PM on page 13

Suggestion
So the estimates are SWAGs? Can we reference an acceptable estimation method, like parametric, analogous, bottom-up?

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:57PM on page 13

Suggestion
Is it necessary to separate out construction management specifically? This is bizarre to me. I can see focusing on pre-design, design, and construction... or I can see focusing on professional services and goods/services and contingency. Consider what story you want to tell with the costs.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:56PM on page 13

Question
Is additional ROW needed?

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:55PM on page 10

Suggestion
Not just more attractive and comfortable, but they contribute to reducing pollution-generating impervious surfaces and our watershed vision. Focus on stormwater management goals.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:54PM on page 10

Suggestion
The City's vision of moving people more efficiently than single-occupancy vehicles.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:53PM on page 10

Suggestion
I would not use language like "Class 1"... call it a shared-use or multi-use path, something my mother-in-law would understand.

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:38PM on page 10

Suggestion
Should crosswalks be the focus here rather than the refuge islands? You could say "Existing crosswalks will be raised to the sidewalk level, calming vehicle speeds where it matters most. Crosswalks will include accessible features, like detectable warning devices, and safety features like median refuges."

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:35PM on page 10

Suggestion
Rather: "The west side curb will be moved 6ft east, maintaining adequate travel lane widths while providing space for a landscape buffer between autos/buses and people riding bikes."

John Wilson Dec 12 2025 at 12:34PM on page 10

Suggestion
I don't believe the City has a particular vision of increasing bus service, but rather a vision of moving more people effectively, and bus service is the best way to do that. I would make a stronger correlation between transit and achieving TDM goals, which supports our circulation element vision.
View all