×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

Draft US 101 Mid County Multimodal Strategy

The TA is accepting Working Group member comments from August 29 to September 5, 2025

The San Mateo County Transportation Authority (TA) has prepared the draft US 101 Mid County Multimodal Strategy which identifies projects that best meet the needs for all types of transportation options. The Mid County strategy includes the cities of Burlingame, San Mateo, Foster City, Belmont, San Carlos, and Redwood Shores. The project includes a one-mile study area along both sides of the corridoor to identify projects that can be considered for inclusion in the funding strategy.

Below, you can view the draft US 101 Mid County Multimodal Strategy and provide input. This strategy aims to improve the way people and goods move through the Mid County portion of the corridor. It includes an introduction to the 101 Corridor Connect program, analysis of existing conditions, summary of the stakeholder and community outreach that was conducted, project identification and scoring methodology, and the final list of priority projects for Mid County.

Share your feedback!

Review the draft US 101 Mid County Multimodal Strategy and provide your feedback by clicking anywhere in the document to provide comments, suggested changes, or questions about the plan:

Use the scroll bar on the right side, or click the "Drag" option in the top toolbar to navigate from page to page.
Click "Comment" in the top toolbar, then click anywhere on the document page to leave feedback. You will be asked to enter your name and email address to submit a comment.

Powered by Konveio

Comments

Close

Commenting is closed for this document.

Jeff Lacap Sep 5 2025 at 5:12PM on page 66

Suggestion

Will need to confirm if C/CAG is co-sponsoring this project.

Jeff Lacap Sep 5 2025 at 5:09PM on page 69

Question

Please clarify if sponsors would be applying for LPP Competitive and/or receiving LPP Formulaic funds

Nicholas Yee Sep 5 2025 at 3:33PM on page 78

Suggestion

Should be spelled Barroilhet

Nicholas Yee Sep 5 2025 at 3:27PM on page 53

Suggestion

Not sure if it was supposed to be used or not here, but we sent over info for the schedule:

Started - Feb 2025 (Central ECR Multimodal Plan, which is helping developing alternatives)
Construction – 2030+ (anticipated)

Nicholas Yee Sep 5 2025 at 3:26PM on page 53

Suggestion

We had suggested "City of" for sponsor, but should omit it for continuity with other city names in the project sheets

Nicholas Yee Sep 5 2025 at 3:26PM on page 51

Suggestion

We had suggested "City of" for sponsor, but should omit it for continuity with other city names in the project sheets

Nicholas Yee Sep 5 2025 at 3:26PM on page 50

Suggestion

We had suggested "City of" for sponsor, but should omit it for continuity with other city names in the project sheets

Nicholas Yee Sep 5 2025 at 3:26PM on page 48

Suggestion

We had suggested "City of" for sponsor, but should omit it for continuity with other city names in the project sheets

Nicholas Yee Sep 5 2025 at 3:15PM on page 50

Suggestion

Not sure if it was supposed to be used or not here, but we sent over info for the schedule:

Started - Feb 2025 (Central ECR Multimodal Plan, which is helping developing alternatives)
Construction – 2030+ (anticipated)

The above schedule is for the majority of San Mateo while the SHOPP project covers a small portion of the northern extents

Nicholas Yee Sep 5 2025 at 3:13PM on page 51

Suggestion

Same comment as before: Just spoke with Burlingame staff the other day about GBI, and in passing we heard correctly construction may not start until early 2026 now. Might be best to confirm dates with them?

Nicholas Yee Sep 5 2025 at 3:12PM on page 51

Suggestion

Should be spelled Barroilhet

Nicholas Yee Sep 5 2025 at 3:10PM on page 50

Suggestion

Just spoke with Burlingame staff the other day about GBI, and in passing we heard correctly construction may not start until early 2026 now. Might be best to confirm dates with them?

Nicholas Yee Sep 5 2025 at 3:08PM on page 48

Suggestion

Not sure if it was supposed to be used or not here, but we sent over info for the schedule:

Started - Feb 2025 (Central ECR Multimodal Plan, which is helping developing alternatives)
Construction – 2030+ (anticipated)

Hannah Greenberg Sep 5 2025 at 11:36AM on page 58

Suggestion

This is the latest cost estimate, but please add a note or asterisk - cost estimate to be refreshed.

Nicholas Yee Sep 5 2025 at 10:47AM on page 36

Suggestion

It's in a gray area, but should Grand Boulevard Initiative and/or Central El Camino Real Multimodal Plan be listed here as well since it's referenced later in the project factsheets?

Gwen Buckley Sep 5 2025 at 9:17AM on page 58

Suggestion

Could also list the Caltrain Capital Improvement Plan

Hanieh Houshmandi Sep 4 2025 at 3:37PM on page 71

Suggestion

Suggest modifying this figure, we are inching near $125M

Hanieh Houshmandi Sep 4 2025 at 3:32PM on page 46

Suggestion

Suggest adding a column with local agency where the project is in.

Hanieh Houshmandi Sep 4 2025 at 3:09PM on page 14

Suggestion

Please label

Malahat Sep 4 2025 at 10:57AM on page 57

Suggestion

the red line will be larger because in reality interchange project starts and ends at least one-two blocks at two sides of the interchange.

Malahat Sep 4 2025 at 10:51AM on page 19

Suggestion

The map doesn't look correct for Redwood Shores. Can you check it with this map? link

Malahat Sep 4 2025 at 10:44AM on page 14

Suggestion

can you label Redwood Shores Pkwy on the map?

Malahat Sep 4 2025 at 10:43AM on page 12

Suggestion

Can you change the legend colors so there are not two orange lines on the map?

Josh Sun Sep 3 2025 at 10:26AM on page 64

Suggestion

The project cost estimate is based on the 2016 Belmont Comprehensive Ped/Bike Plan study and may not reflect current costs. It would be better to list it as pending here.